Alex convened a field-language（语境补充词）/field-language/ review after recordings and two disputed transcripts produced two incompatible accounts. The assignment, Evidence Before the Deadline, required a decision that could be checked by speakers whose dialect was being documented. In light of（鉴于；根据）/ɪn laɪt əv/ the new material, the panel kept（语境补充词）/kɛpt/ the disputed claim under review（正在审查中）/ˈəndər ˌrivˈju/. For this case, the first evidence index fixed one intended sense by part of speech: the adjectives frenetic（狂热的）/frə'netɪk/, mercantile（商业的）/'mɜːk(ə)ntaɪl/, poetic（诗的）/pəʊ'etɪk/, gymnastic（体操的）/dʒɪm'næstɪk/, aristocratic（贵族的）/,ærɪstə'krætɪk/, alphabetic（字母的）/,ælfə'betikəl, ,ælfə'betik/, euphemistic（委婉的）/juːfɪ'mɪstɪk/, totalitarian（极权主义的）/,təʊtælɪ'teərɪən; tə(ʊ),tælɪ-/, and magnetic（地磁的）/mæg'netɪk/; the nouns segregation（隔离）/,segrɪ'geɪʃ(ə)n/ and fanatic（狂热入迷者）/fə'nætɪk/; the verb satiate（充分满足）/'seɪʃɪeɪt/. These labels came from different sources, so the team recorded who supplied each item, when it appeared, and whether an independent witness could confirm it.

Morgan asked the group to draw a distinction（作出区分）/drɔ ə dɪˈstɪŋkʃən/ between direct evidence and persuasive wording. A second packet contained the adjectives antic（古怪的）/'æntɪk/, stylistic（体裁上的）/staɪ'lɪstɪk/, autocratic（专制的）/ɔːtə'krætɪk/, enigmatic（神秘的）/,enɪg'mætɪk/, democratic（民主的）/demə'krætɪk/, climactic（高潮的）/klaɪ'mæktɪk/, genetic（遗传的）/dʒɪ'netɪk/, authoritarian（独裁主义的）/ɔː,θɒrɪ'teərɪən/, pragmatic（实际的）/præg'mætɪk/, ascetic（苦行的）/ə'setɪk/, humanitarian（人道主义的）/hjʊ,mænɪ'teərɪən/, and manic（躁狂的）/'mænɪk/. Some entries described people, some named objects, and others expressed actions or judgments（裁判、宣告）/'dʒʌdʒmәnt/. The difference mattered because a vivid expression could influence readers without proving the underlying（在下面的）/.ʌndә'laiiŋ/ claim. The panel reviewed the file because the public account lacked sufficient evidence.

The disputed transcript then introduced the adjectives mystic（神秘的）/'mɪstɪk/, hermetic（密封的）/hɜː'metɪk/, artistic（艺术的）/ɑː'tɪstɪk/, patriotic（爱国的）/ˌpætrɪˈɒtɪk/, utilitarian（功利的）/jʊ,tɪlɪ'teərɪən/, anaesthetic（麻醉的）/,ænɪs'θetɪk/, majestic（庄严的）/mə'dʒestɪk/, aromatic（芳香的）/ærə'mætɪk/, erotic（色情的）/ɪ'rɒtɪk/, and dogmatic（教条的）/dɒg'mætɪk/; the nouns visitation（访问）/vɪzɪ'teɪʃ(ə)n/ and agnostic（不可知论者）/æg'nɒstɪk/. Alex said, “I want every objection on the record（正式记录在案）/ɔn ðə ˈrɛkərd/ before we approve this explanation.” Morgan replied, “New testimony could call into question（使受到质疑）/kɔl ˈɪntu kˈwɛʃən/ the first account, even if the deadline is close.” Riley asked, “Can the public see which details remain uncertain and which have been verified?” Alex answered, “Yes. We will publish the reasoning, the limits, and the person responsible for the next check.”

The late appendix listed the nouns stoic（斯多葛学派哲学家）/ and vulgarity（粗俗）/vʌl'gærɪtɪ/; the adjectives egalitarian（平等主义的）/ɪ,gælɪ'teərɪən/, gigantic（巨大的）/dʒaɪ'gæntɪk/, eclectic（折衷的）/ɪ'klektɪk/, apologetic（道歉的）/əpɒlə'dʒetɪk/, idiomatic（惯用的）/,ɪdɪə'mætɪk/, didactic（说教的）/dɪ'dæktɪk; daɪ-/, thematic（主题的）/θɪ'mætɪk/, phonetic（语音的）/fə'netɪk/, and anarchic（无政府的）/ə'nɑːkɪk/; the verb domesticate（驯养）/də'mestɪkeɪt/. The team agreed to take the delayed report into account（把迟到的报告考虑在内）/teɪk ðə dɪˈleɪd rɪˈpɔrt ˈɪntu əˈkaʊnt/ in accordance with（按照；依据）/ɪn əˈkɔrdəns wɪθ/ the rules. Although the deadline was close, the reviewers（评论者、书评作者）/ri'vju:ә(r)/ refused to hide uncertainty（不确定、不可靠）/.ʌn'sә:tnti/. They matched every assertion to a page and marked conflicts. They asked whether the new record could change the decision. That procedure protected speakers whose dialect was being documented and the wider audience expected to rely on the result.

The final cross-check（语境补充词）/cross-check/ covered the adjectives synthetic（综合的）/sɪn'θetɪk/, ecstatic（狂喜的）/ɪk'stætɪk; ek-/, diplomatic（外交的）/dɪplə'mætɪk/, venomous（有毒的）/'venəməs/, futuristic（未来派的）/fjuːtʃə'rɪstɪk/, arctic（北极的）/'ɑːktɪk/, chaotic（混沌的）/keɪ'ɒtɪk/, and quixotic（唐吉诃德式的）/kwɪk'sɒtɪk/; the nouns heretic（异教徒）/'herɪtɪk/, humanity（人类）/hjʊ'mænɪtɪ/, dialectic（辩证法）/,daɪə'lektɪk/, and scenery（风景）/'siːn(ə)rɪ/. At short notice（临时通知；仓促之下）/æt ʃɔrt ˈnoʊtɪs/, the three reviewers reached a consensus（达成共识）/riʧt ə kənˈsɛnsəs/ but left room for（为……留下余地）/lɛft rum fər/ revision. If the evidence remains incomplete, the board will publish a qualified finding. The final memo not only corrected the claim but also explained the next step. It named the strongest source, preserved the minority objection, assigned a follow-up（语境补充词）/ˈfɑloʊˌəp/ check, and produced an annotated（作注解、注释）/'ænәuteit/ transcript and a consent note. The practical lesson was simple: advanced vocabulary is useful when it helps a team classify evidence, question assumptions, and make a decision that another person can audit.